Youth residing in California with an out-of-state dependency case

Q: If a foster youth is living in a foster care placement in California but is a foster youth from another state (with services paid for by another state), is he/she eligible for AB 12 in California?

A: Assembly Bill 12 is a California specific law that extends foster care to 21 only in the state of California. In order for a youth to be AB 12 eligible, he/she has to be a California dependent with an order for foster care placement by a California juvenile court when he/she turns 18 years old.  A youth from another state could be participating in their host state’s extended foster care program (EFC), if in fact that other state has adopted EFC for youth over the age of 18.  If the host state has an EFC program then the host state would be working with California to place this youth in California and the host state would be paying for placement.  California may agree to provide monthly visits to the youth as a courtesy to the host state, but this youth would NOT be participating in the AB 12 program. 

Reference: All County Letter 11-69, page 17 speaks to out of county placements

One thought on “Youth residing in California with an out-of-state dependency case

  1. Beverly Butler says:

    I believe you have misused the term “host state”. In this situation California is the host state. The other state would be the placing agency with jurisdiction and responsibility for payment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: