Timeline for Homeless Youth in SILP

Q: I am a supervisor of Extended Foster Care in a county child welfare agency.  I am wondering if you can direct me to information regarding Non-Minor Dependents who are placed in a Supervised Independent Living Placement (SILP) and become homeless, living temporarily with their biological parents.

I know that funding would not be provided while the NMD is living temporarily at his parents.  However, I am wondering what, if any, timelines apply.  Specifically, is there a time by which the county may terminate jurisdiction because the NMD cannot locate a SILP placement? I would appreciate any direction you can provide.

A: A NMD has a review hearings every 6 months and the court has to review program eligibility, including placement. As long as a the NMD is meeting the eligibility criteria for extended foster care, a recommendation to terminate jurisdiction based on the county agency’s inability to locate appropriate housing is not appropriate and would not meet the requisite burden for a court to terminate jurisdiction. Ultimately, the county agency is responsible for placement of NMDs. The county agency worker must continue to meet with the youth monthly and make efforts to assist the youth in identifying appropriate housing.

In circumstances where the county and the NMD are struggling to identify options, the following suggestions might be helpful: First, determine if the young person is willing to live in a placement other than a SILP, such as THP+FC. If so, refer the youth to a local program.  If there is no placement, the county is obligated to provide a placement for youth, in the same way that the county is obligated to provide a placement for a minor.  One approach that has been used by counties facing this circumstance is to pay for the youth to live a hotel while the youth and social worker are waiting for a THP+FC opening to become available.

If the youth is not willing to live in a placement other than a SILP, the county agency worker must continue to meet with the youth monthly wherever he or she is temporarily located and make efforts to assist the youth in identifying appropriate housing.

One thought on “Timeline for Homeless Youth in SILP

  1. Jean Vilmenay says:

    Just because a youth is NOT receiving his AB 12 payment does NOT mean his case should be closed. Receiving AB 12 payment and AB 12 case management are two very different matters. If the youth is other wise eligible, he is removing barriers to employment/education or enrolled in high school or college he is still eligible for case management. All AB 12 cases MUST go through the COURTS to be closed out. This case should remain open as along as he is seeking to comply with the eligibility requirements or the case has not been closed by the courts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: